Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Ministrap, LLC v. AutoZone, Inc.
as 2:2022cv00229
Plaintiff:
Ministrap, LLC
Defendant:
AutoZone, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Consolidated Transaction Processing LLC v. AutoZone, Inc.
as 4:2020cv00411
Plaintiff:
Consolidated Transaction Processing LLC
Defendant:
AutoZone, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Pi-Net International, Inc. v. Autozone, Inc.,
as 2:2013cv01041
Defendant:
Autozone, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Pi-Net International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Kroy IP Holdings, LLC v. Autozone, Inc.,
as 2:2013cv00888
Plaintiff:
Kroy IP Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
Autozone, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Arunachalam v. AutoZone Inc
as 2:2013cv00593
Plaintiff:
Lakshmi Arunachalam
Defendant:
AutoZone Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
EMG Technology, LLC v. Autozone, Inc.,
as 6:2013cv00143
Plaintiff:
EMG Technology, LLC
Defendant:
Autozone, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Patent Group LLC v. AUTOZONE, INC.
as 2:2012cv00015
Plaintiff:
Patent Group LLC
Defendant:
AutoZone Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
GeoTag Inc v. Rent-A-Center Inc et al
as 2:2010cv00573
Plaintiff:
GEOTAG, INC.
Defendant:
RENT-A-CENTER, INC. , ALAMO RENT A CAR, LLC , ADVANCE AUTO PARTS, INC. and others
Counter_claimant:
INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS OF AMERICA, INC. , PENSKE TRUCK LEASING CO., L.P. , PENSKE SYSTEM, INC. and others
Counter_defendant:
GEOTAG, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Gildersleeve Holdings AG LLC v. Autozone, Inc., et al
as 2:2010cv00031
Plaintiff:
Gildersleeve Holdings AG LLC
Defendant:
Autozone, Inc.,, The Kroger Co.,, Classmates Media Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Landmark Technology LLC v. Aropostale et al
as 6:2009cv00262
Plaintiff:
Landmark Technology LLC
Defendant:
Aeropostale, Autozone, Inc.,, Chico's FAS, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
