Cases 21 - 29 of 29
WARNER v. AUTOZONE, INC.
as 2:2010cv05376
Plaintiff:
DANIEL WARNER
Defendant:
AUTOZONE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
Autozone Inc, et al v. Strick, et al
as 1:2003cv08152
Plaintiff:
Autozone, Inc. and AutoZone Parts, Inc.
Defendant:
Michael Strick , Strick Enterprises, Inc. and Strick, Inc.
Counter_claimant:
Michael Strick , Strick Enterprises, Inc. and Strick, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Autozone, Inc. and AutoZone Parts, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
William Doland et al v. Autozone Inc et al
as 8:2009cv01138
Plaintiff:
William Doland, William Doland, William Doland and others
Defendant:
Autozone Inc, Autozone Inc and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Bruce Paul Maynard v. Autozone Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv07209
Plaintiff:
Bruce Paul Maynard and Bruce Paul Maynard
Defendant:
Autozone Inc., Autozone Inc. and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Autozone, Inc. v. Michael Migi
as 09-80121
Petitioner:
AUTOZONE, INC.
Respondent:
MICHAEL MIGIS, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated
Autozone, Inc. v. Posadas
as 1:2009cv02951
Plaintiff:
Autozone, Inc. and Autozone, Inc.
Defendant:
Edwin Posadas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Autozone, Inc. v. Michael Migi
as 09-80031
Petitioner:
AUTOZONE, INC.
Respondent:
MICHAEL MIGIS, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated
Watkins v. Autozone, Inc.
as 3:2008cv01509
Plaintiff:
Matthew Watkins and Matthew Watkins
Defendant:
Autozone, Inc. and DOES
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Claudia Moreno, et al v. Autozone, Inc.
as 08-80094
Plaintiff - Respondent:
CLAUDIA MORENO, individually, and on behalf of all persons similarly situated and MICHELE MEDRANO, individually, and on behalf of all persons similarly situated
Defendant - Petitioner:
AUTOZONE, INC., a Nevada corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
