Cases 41 - 50 of 85
Cryer v. Franklin Resources, Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv04265
Defendant:
Franklin Resources, Inc and Franklin Resources, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Cryer and Marlon H. Cryer
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Nelly F. Fernandez
Consolidated Defendant:
Franklin Templeton 401(k) Retirement Plan Investment Committee, Norman Frisbie, Jennifer Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits
Flowers v. Johnson et al
as 1:2015cv01778
Plaintiff:
Rubert Flowers
Defendant:
B. Johnson, M. Martinez and T. Marsh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Erlindo Rodriguez Jr v. County Jail of San Bernardino et al
as 5:2015cv02405
Defendant:
County Jail of San Bernardino, B Johnson and B Johnson
Plaintiff:
Erlindo Rodriguez, Jr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv08003
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cathy v. Moltzen, et al.
as 2:2015cv01646
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Cathy
Defendant:
E. Moltzen, D. Leavitt, T. Thorpe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. California Departement of Corrections & Rehabilitation
as 2:2015cv01584
Plaintiff:
Joseph Duane Turner
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, B. Johnson and Brennon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCrea v. Johnson, et al.
as 2:2015cv01487
Plaintiff:
Terrence McCrea
Defendant:
B. Johnson and Jeff McComber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flowers v. Beard et al
as 1:2015cv00919
Plaintiff:
Rupert Flowers
Defendant:
Jeffrey Beard, B. Johnson, M. Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Gonzales, et al.
as 1:2015cv00301
Plaintiff:
John C Thompson
Defendant:
J Gonzales, D Perez, B Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miele v. Franklin Resources, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00199
Plaintiff:
Anthony P. Miele, III
Defendant:
Franklin Resources, Inc. and Charles B. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
