Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Schirano v. Blackstone Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00558
Plaintiff:
Michael Schirano
Defendant:
Blackstone Inc., Blackstone Group Management L.L.C., BXG Buzz Holdings L.P. and others
Nominal Defendant:
Bumble, Inc.
Intervenor:
City of Vero Beach Police Officers' Retirement Fund's and Wilbert Alberto Otero Sanchez
Messana v. Anderson et al
as 1:2022cv01195
Plaintiff:
Dana Messana
Defendant:
Christine L. Anderson, R. Lynn Atchison, Sachin J. Bavishi and others
Nominal Defendant:
Bumble, Inc.
The William B. Federman Irrevocable Trust v. Mather et al
as 1:2022cv01120
Plaintiff:
The William B. Federman Irrevocable Trust
Defendant:
Ann Mather, Whitney Wolfe-Herd, Pamela A. Thomas-Graham and others
Nominal Defendant:
Bumble Inc.
Glover-Mott v. Herd et al
as 1:2022cv01070
Plaintiff:
MARILEE C. GLOVER-MOTT
Defendant:
Whitney Wolfe Herd, Anuradha B. Subramanian, Ann Mather and others
Nominal Defendant:
Bumble Inc.
MITROS v. MORGAN
as 1:2021cv12055
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY DAVID MITROS
Defendant:
WILLIAM B. MORGAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MITROS v. MORGAN
as 1:2021cv02403
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY DAVID MITROS
Defendant:
WILLIAM B. MORGAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MITROS v. MORGAN
as 1:2021cv02085
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY DAVID MITROS
Defendant:
WILLIAM B. MORGAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MITROS v. MORGAN
as 1:2021cv00716
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY DAVID MITROS
Defendant:
WILLIAM B. MORGAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORGAN v. QUEST DIAGNOSTIC INCORPORATED
as 2:2020cv00430
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL B. MORGAN
Defendant:
QUEST DIAGNOSTIC INCORPORATED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
MORGAN v. TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS U.S.A., INC. et al
as 2:2019cv04373
Defendant:
TAKEDA DEVELOPMENT CENTER AMERICAS, INC. F/K/A TAKEDA GLOBAL RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CENTER, INC., TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY LIMITED, Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
WALTER B MORGAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
