Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Baker v. Procter & Gamble Company et al
as 2:2010cv02277
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Baker
Defendant:
Procter & Gamble Company, Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Company and Procter & Gamble Distributing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Baker v. Bausch & Lomb, Inc.
as 2:2010cv02273
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Baker
Defendant:
Bausch & Lomb, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Baker v. Bayer Aktiengescellschaft Corporation et al
as 2:2010cv02271
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Baker
Defendant:
Bayer Aktiengescellschaft Corporation, Bayer Corporation, Bayer Healthcare, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Baker v. Glaxosmithkline Healthcare, LP et al
as 2:2010cv02274
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Baker
Defendant:
Glaxosmithkline Healthcare, LP and Glaxosmithkline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Baker v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation et al
as 2:2010cv02272
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Baker
Defendant:
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Novartis Animal Health US, Inc. and Novartis Opthalmics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
A&W Restaurants, Inc. v. Baker et al
as 3:2009cv00277
Plaintiff:
A&W Restaurants, Inc.
Defendant:
Tina M. Baker and William P. Baker, Sr.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Godfather's Pizza, Inc. v. Canda Mart, LLC et al
as 1:2007cv00052
Plaintiff:
Godfather's Pizza, Inc. and Godfather's Pizza, Inc.
Defendant:
Canda Mart, LLC, Team Work Enterprises, Inc. and Team Work Enterprises, Inc.
Cross Claimant:
Team Work Enterprises, Inc. and Team Work Enterprises, Inc.
Cross Defendant:
Baker Energy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Godfather's Pizza, Inc. v. Om Deep, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00048
Plaintiff:
Godfather's Pizza, Inc. and Godfather's Pizza, Inc.
Defendant:
Om Deep, Inc. and Om Deep, Inc.
Cross Claimant:
Om Deep, Inc. and Om Deep, Inc.
Cross Defendant:
Baker Energy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
