Cases 1 - 10 of 270
Asano Bankers Hill LLC v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 3:2024cv00481
Plaintiff:
Asano Bankers Hill LLC
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A. and Does 1- 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 nr Diversity-Notice of Removal
Harrison v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 3:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Ganga Harrison
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A.
Medina v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 3:2023cv02207
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Medina
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Fieck v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 3:2023cv01957
Plaintiff:
Erin Fieck
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Copeland et al v. Winnebago Industries, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv01738
Plaintiff:
Jean T. Copeland and James D. Copeland
Defendant:
Winnebago Industries, Inc., La Mesa R.V. Center, Inc., Bank of America, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Heimann v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 3:2023cv01191
Plaintiff:
Eric Heimann
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Brady v. Bank of America
as 3:2023cv00072
Plaintiff:
Michael Brady
Defendant:
Bank of America and Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 FCC-Unsolicited Telephone Sales
Yuhasz v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 3:2022cv01807
Plaintiff:
Steven Yuhasz
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 fr Removal- Fraud
Emanuel Manukyan v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 3:2022cv01760
Plaintiff:
Emanuel Manukyan
Respondent:
Bank of America, N.A. and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 pr Petition for Removal
Wang v. Bank of America , N.A.
as 3:2022cv01600
Plaintiff:
Hwai Ting Wang
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
