Cases 1 - 10 of 16
STRIPLIN v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2023cv01868
Plaintiff:
AARON WILLIAMS STRIPLIN
Not Classified By Court:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JEFF SESSIONS, JOHN G. ROBERTS, JR. and others
Defendant:
Band Bank Ltd, SQUATTER, PETER NEWSHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
STRIPLIN v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2023cv01739
Plaintiff:
AAREN STRIPLIN and AARON WILLIAMS STRIPLIN
Defendant:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., KAMALA HARRIS, ROBERT MUELLER and others
KELLY v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2023cv00166
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS KELLY
Defendant:
BARACK OBAMA, MERRICK GARLAND, REWARDS FOR JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BARRETT v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2022cv02823
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY P. BARRETT
Defendant:
JOSEPH BIDEN, KAMALA HARRIS, BARACK OBAMA and others
Claimant:
NANCY PELOSI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WOUBETU v. PEOPLE WHO GO TO SAINT MARY'S CHURCH et al
as 1:2022cv02164
Plaintiff:
SAMSON WOUBETU
Defendant:
PEOPLE WHO WORK AT SAINT MARY'S CHURCH, PEOPLE WHO GO TO SAINT MARY'S CHURCH, METENU MENGESHA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
FEEGBEH v. BUSH
as 1:2019cv03256
Defendant:
GEORGE W. BUSH and BARACK OBAMA
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM FEEGBEH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CEASER v. OBAMA
as 1:2018cv02017
Plaintiff:
OSCAR CEASER
Defendant:
BARACK OBAMA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
QUARTEY v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2018cv00896
Plaintiff:
MARY AKU QUARTEY
Defendant:
BARACK OBAMA, MICHELLE OBAMA, OPRAH WINFREH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLEMING v. HAMAMOTO et al
as 1:2016cv01535
Plaintiff:
RICHARD M. FLEMING
Defendant:
PAMELA K. HAMAMOTO and BARACK OBAMA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2015cv01538
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH JOHNSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, BARACK OBAMA, STATE OF MISSOURI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
