Cases 1 - 8 of 8
BASF Corporation v. Moreland Holding Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv02025
Defendant:
Moreland Holding Company, Inc. doing business as Sugar Hill Auto Collision also known as Sugar Hill Auto Collision, Sugar Hill Auto Collision and Kevin Moreland
Plaintiff:
BASF Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
BASF Corporation v. SNF Holding Company et al
as 4:2017cv00251
Plaintiff:
BASF Corporation
Defendant:
SNF Holding Company , Flopam Inc. , Chemtall Inc. and others
Movant:
BASF Americas Corporation, BASFIN Corporation, BASF USA Holding LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
BASF Corporation v. Georgia Luxury Automotive, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv05292
Plaintiff:
BASF Corporation
Defendant:
Georgia Luxury Automotive, Inc. and Hossein Kafaei
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lewis et al v. Axens North America, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv00027
Plaintiff:
Brian D. Lewis and Stephanie Lewis
Defendant:
Axens North America, Inc. , BASF Catalysts, LLC. , BASF Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
RAVEN HILL PARTNERS INC v. BASF CORPORATION et al
as 5:2012cv00411
Plaintiff:
RAVEN HILL PARTNERS INC
Defendant:
BASF CORPORATION, BASF CATALYSTS LLC, BASF SCHWEIZ AG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
BASF Corporation v. Atlanta Collision Center, LLC et al
as 1:2010cv00510
Plaintiff:
BASF Corporation
Defendant:
Atlanta Collision Center, LLC and Jay A. Purpura
BASF Corporation v. Roswell Collision Center, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv01629
Plaintiff:
BASF Corporation
Defendant:
Roswell Collision Center, Inc., Collision Pro of Woodstock, Inc. and James Richard Ousley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Type:
Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
