Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Baylor UniversityIn re: Baylor University
as 21-50786
Petitioner:
In re: Baylor University
Respondent:
Jane Doe 11
Baylor UniversityIn re: Baylor University
as 21-50386
Respondent:
Jane Doe 14, Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 11 and others
Petitioner:
In re: Baylor University
King v. Baylor
as 21-50352
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Allison King
Defendant / Appellee:
Baylor University
MAGEE et al v. TEXAS HEART HOSPITAL OF THE SOUTHWEST, L.L.P. et al
as 1:2020mc00038
Defendant:
BAYLOR UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER, BAYLOR SCOTT & WHITE ALL SAINTS MEDICAL CENTER, BAYLOR HEALTH CARE SYSTEM and others
Plaintiff:
TODD M. DEWEY and MITCHELL J. MAGEE
Respondent:
CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES
Steven Sims v. Rosaline Chatham-Sims, et al
as 19-11020
Defendant / Appellee:
JACK DOWNING, THOMAS WILLIAMS, DALLAS COUNTY HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVEN SHEROD SIMS
USA v. Baylor Scott & White Health, et al
as 19-50818
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT & WHITE HOSPITAL - ROUND ROCK, SCOTT & WHITE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL TEMPLE, HILLCREST BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
INTEGRA MED ANALYTICS, L.L.C.
Sandra Hale v. USA, et al
as 19-20164
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SANDRA G. HALE
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL DEBAKEY MEDICAL CENTER (VA HOSPITAL), UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RAJANI POTU, Doctor and others
Faulk v. Baylor University
as 6:2018cv00341
Defendant:
Baylor University
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Faulk
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. ยง 1681
Robbins v. Does 1-10
as 1:2018mc00647
Defendant:
Baylor University
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 10, Jane Doe 2 and others
Respondent:
Jane Does 1-10
Movant:
William K. Robbins, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Robbins v. Does 1-10
as 6:2018mc00219
Defendant:
Baylor University
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 10, Jane Doe 2 and others
Respondent:
Jane Does 1-10
Movant:
William K. Robbins, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
