Cases 1 - 10 of 44
RODRIGUEZ v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2024cv07668
Respondent:
BECKY SCOTT and HUDSON COUNTY JAIL
Petitioner:
KEITH RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
FLORES v. HUDSON COUNTY BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS et al
as 2:2024cv06674
Defendant:
HUDSON COUNTY BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS, MICHAEL DANTICO, JOHN OR JANE DOE and others
Plaintiff:
JASON FLORES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GERENA v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2024cv08179
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM GERENA
Defendant:
SAMANTHA PIRNAT and BECKY SCOTT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAWKINS v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2024cv06629
Defendant:
HUDSON COUNTY MEDICAL DEPT. and BECKY SCOTT
Plaintiff:
KEVIN DAWKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRAWFORD v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2024cv06520
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY CRAWFORD
Defendant:
BECKY SCOTT and HUDSON COUNTY MEDICAL DEPT.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ABDELGADER v. HUDSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILIATION et al
as 2:2024cv07775
Defendant:
HUDSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILIATION, MRS. PROHPET, MRS. BECKY SCOTT and others
Plaintiff:
TAREK ABDELGADER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BERNER v. SCOTT
as 2:2024cv06865
Defendant:
BECKY SCOTT
Plaintiff:
DYLAN BERNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRIS v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2024cv07524
Plaintiff:
THORON HARRIS
Defendant:
HUDSON COUNTY MEDICAL DEPT. and BECKY SCOTT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COOPER v. SCOTT
as 2:2024cv07068
Respondent:
BECKY SCOTT
Petitioner:
TYSHON L. COOPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MILLER v. JOHN DOE et al
as 2:2024cv06627
Petitioner:
WOODROW MILLER, III
Respondent:
BECKY SCOTT, JOHN DOE and GOV. N.J.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
