Cases 1 - 8 of 8
HALL V. BED BATH & BEYOND, INC.
as 11-1165
Defendant-Appellee:
Bed Bath & Beyond Procurement Co. Inc., Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc., Farley S. Nachemin and others
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Roger J. Hall and Roger J. Hall
Defendant/Cross Appellant:
West Point Home, Inc. and West Point Home, Inc.
HALL V BED BATH
as 10-1403
Defendant-Appellee:
Bed Bath & Beyond Procurement Co. Inc., Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc., Christine Gitli and others
Plaintiff-Appellant:
RJ Hall & Associates, Roger J. Hall, RJ Hall & Associates and others
Hall et al v. Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv04391
Plaintiff:
Roger J. Hall and RJ Hall & Associates
Defendant:
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc., Bed Bath & Beyond Procurement Co. Inc., Farley S. Nachemin and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
BED BATH & BEYOND PROCUREMENT CO. INC. v. WOOWEE GROUP LIMITED et al
as 2:2009cv02507
Plaintiff:
BED BATH & BEYOND PROCUREMENT CO. INC.
Defendant:
WOOWEE GROUP LIMITED and WOOWEE CANADA INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
BED BATH & BEYOND INC. et al v. FIXEDCREDITNOW et al
as 2:2008cv06406
Plaintiff:
BED BATH & BEYOND INC. and BED BATH & BEYOND PROCUREMENT CO., INC.
Defendant:
FIXEDCREDITNOW, AARON RODGERS, ERIC MAYNARD and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
BED BATH & BEYOND INC. et al v. JUMPSTART TECHNOLOGIES, LLC et al
as 2:2008cv00357
Plaintiff:
BED BATH & BEYOND INC. and BED BATH & BEYOND PROCUREMENT CO., INC.
Defendant:
JUMPSTART TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, HARDING INNOVATIONS, LLC and GREG TSENG
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
BED BATH & BEYOND INC. et al v. GENEROUS GENIE et al
as 2:2007cv02105
Plaintiff:
BED BATH & BEYOND INC. and BED BATH & BEYOND PROCUREMENT CO. INC.
Defendant:
GENEROUS GENIE, REWARD AMAZON, VC E-COMMERCE SOLUTIONS NETWORK and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
