Cases 1 - 9 of 9
AT&T Mobility LLC, et al v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al
as 11-16188
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AT&T MOBILITY LLC, AT&T CORP., AT&T SERVICES, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA, INC, CHI MEI CORPORATION and others
AU Optronics Corporation, et al v. USDCSF, et al
as 10-71745
:
In re: AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION and AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA
Petitioner:
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION and AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA
Respondent:
USDC, SAN FRANCISCO
Defendant:
EPSON ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Real Party In Interest:
CHI MEI INNOLUX, NEXGEN MEDIATECH USA, INC., HANNSTAR DISPLAY CORPORATION and others
Motorola, Inc., et al v. Hannstar Display Corporation, et al
as 10-16215
In Re:
In re: TFT-LCD, (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff:
MOTOROLA, INC., AT&T MOBILITY, LLC, AT&T CORPORATION and others
Intervenor:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Intervenor - Appellee:
STATE OF ILLINOIS and STATE OF WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellant:
HANNSTAR DISPLAY CORPORATION
Defendant:
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA, CHI MEI INNOLUX and others
Motorola, Inc., et al v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al
as 10-16182
In Re:
In re: TFT-LCD, (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff:
MOTOROLA, INC., AT&T MOBILITY, LLC, AT&T CORPORATION and others
Intervenor:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Intervenor - Appellee:
STATE OF ILLINOIS and STATE OF WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellant:
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION and AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA
Defendant:
CHI MEI INNOLUX, NEXGEN MEDIATECH USA, INC., CHUNGHWA PICTURE TUBES, LTD and others
AT&T Mobility LLC et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 3:2009cv04997
Plaintiff:
AT&T Mobility LLC, AT&T Mobility LLC, AT&T Mobility LLC and others
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corporation, Au Optronics Corporation America, Inc, Chi Mei Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Howard Jacobs, et al v. AT&T Corp., et al
as 09-16707
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HOWARD JACOBS, a natural person, LAURENCE KORNBLUM, a natural person, KATHLEEN MILLER, a natural person, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee:
AT&T CORP., a foreign corporation, AMERICAN TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, a foreign corporation, BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC., a foreign corporation and others
Defendant-intervenor - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Amicus Curiae:
LAW PROFESSORS
Tina Herron, et al v. Verizon Global Networks, Inc., et al
as 09-16704
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TINA HERRON, BRANDY SERGI, individually and as representative of all similarly situated individuals and ALL PLAINTIFFS
Defendant - Appellee:
VERIZON GLOBAL NETWORKS, INC., AT&T CORP., AMERICAN TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY and others
Defendant-intervenor - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Amicus Curiae:
LAW PROFESSORS
Higdon v. AT&T Corp et al
as 5:2008cv03526
Plaintiff:
John M Higdon and John M Higdon
Defendant:
AT&T Corp, BellSouth Corporation, Bellsouth Telecommunication, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Jacobs et al v. AT&T Corp. et al
as 3:2007cv02538
Plaintiff:
Howard Jacobs, Laurence Kornblum and Kathleen Miller
Defendant:
AT&T Corp., AT&T Corp., American Telephone and Telegraph Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
