Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Rasheena PhiniseeIn re: Rasheena Phinisee
as 21-1145
Respondent:
DREXEL UNIVERSITY, PATRICIA HAYGOOD, RANDOLPH MATTHEWS and others
Petitioner:
In re: RASHEENA PHINISEE
In re: David Robinson
as 20-2053
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and BERLE M. SCHILLER
Petitioner:
In re: DAVID ROBINSON
In re: Wheeler Zamichieli
as 15-3232
Defendant - Petitioner:
In re: WHEELER ZAMICHIELI
Plaintiff - Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
BERLE M. SCHILLER and LEGROME D. DAVIS
Banks v. Fitzgerald et al
as 5:2014cv01163
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Rich Fitzgerald, Harper, Landya McCafferty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. McCafferty et al
as 1:2014cv01234
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Landya McCafferty, Joseph N. Laplante, Steven J. McAuliffe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Michael Piskanin, Jr.
as 14-8064
Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL JOHN PISKANIN, JR.
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT CRESSON SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY LEHIGH COUNTY, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and others
In re: Michael Piskanin, Jr.
as 14-8065
Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL JOHN PISKANIN, JR.
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT CRESSON SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY LEHIGH COUNTY, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and others
Michael Piskanin, Jr. v. Mary McLaughlin, et al
as 12-4270
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL JOHN PISKANIN, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN, MICHAEL M BAYLSON, BERLE M. SCHILLER and others
In re: Michael Piskanin, Jr., et al
as 11-4161
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL JOHN PISKANIN, JR.
Defendant - Respondent:
KENNETH CAMERON, JAMES B. MARTIN and THOMAS W. CORBETT, JR.
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
BERLE M. SCHILLER
In Re: Omini Onen William
as 09-4485
Defendant - Petitioner:
In re: OMINI ONEN WILLIAMS, AKA Williams Omini Onen, AKA William Omini
Plaintiff - Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
BERLE M. SCHILLER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
