Cases 1 - 10 of 489
COULTER v. BERRY, DUNN, MCNEIL, & PARKER LLC
as 4:2024cv00201
Plaintiff:
Emily Coulter
Defendant:
Berry, Dunn, McNeil & Parker, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv80585
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Berry v. Fedex Freight, Inc.
as 6:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Christopher Deven Berry
Defendant:
Fedex Freight, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
BERRY v. DRIGGERS
as 3:2023cv24747
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN KLEINS BERRY
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, A DRIGGERS and R HINES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berry v. Refresco Beverages U.S. Inc.
as 8:2023cv02763
Plaintiff:
John Berry
Defendant:
Refresco Beverages U.S. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Berry v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2023cv02696
Plaintiff:
Sylvester Berry
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and SSA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv62197
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Berry v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv24416
Plaintiff:
Corey Duran Berry
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Jones v. Berry et al
as 2:2023cv14317
Plaintiff:
Carlton Lee Jones
Defendant:
Lawrence Berry, Aleta Butts, Colleen Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
BERRY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv33582
Plaintiff:
PATRICK BERRY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
