Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Bet Midrash Ohr Ha-Chayim Ha-Kadosh, Inc. v. American Zurich Insurance Company
as 0:2023cv62238
Plaintiff:
Bet Midrash Ohr Ha-Chayim Ha-Kadosh, Inc.
Defendant:
American Zurich Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Evans et al v. BET Streaming, LLC
as 6:2023cv01978
Plaintiff:
McKenzie Evans and Denise Brinkley
Defendant:
BET Interactive, LLC and BET Streaming, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gray v. BET Information Systems, Inc.
as 8:2022cv02136
Plaintiff:
Danielle E Gray
Defendant:
BET Information Systems, Inc.
GILMAN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv12938
Plaintiff:
JACQUELYN BETS GILMAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Crosby v. Alexander et al
as 3:2021cv00644
Defendant:
Grant Alexander, Jacksonville Greyhound Racing, Inc. doing business as Best Bet Jacksonville and Alexander Grant
Plaintiff:
John D. Crosby, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chanel, Inc. v. 5creplicachanel.com et al
as 0:2019cv62333
Defendant:
luxuryshoesa.com, forsalereplicabags.com, cart7a.com and others
Plaintiff:
Chanel, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Audemars Piguet Holding SA v. 1forclock.ru et al
as 0:2018cv60351
Plaintiff:
Audemars Piguet Holding SA
Defendant:
1forclock.ru, 316watchs.com, 5areplicawatch.com and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Randolph v. Obama et al
as 3:2011cv00928
Plaintiff:
Kelda K. Randolph
Defendant:
Barack Obama, George W. Bush, Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Developers Surety and Indemnity Company v. BET Construction and Roofing Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv20058
Plaintiff:
Developers Surety and Indemnity Company and Developers Surety and Indemnity Company
Defendant:
BET Construction and Roofing Services, Inc., James Scardina, Christina Bethancourt Scardina and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
