Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv00195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702
Ronald Emrit v. Secretary Betsy Devos, et al
as 20-13362
Defendant / Appellee:
ACTION FINANCIAL SERVICES, BETSY DEVOS, Secretary, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Cothran et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 8:2020cv01633
Plaintiff:
Chris Sevier, Deb Maxwell, Charlene Cothran and others
Defendant:
Michael R. Pompeo, Seema Verma, Victoria A. Lipnic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronald Emrit v. Betsy Devos, et al
as 20-11763
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, ACTION FINANCIAL SERVICES, BETSY DEVOS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Ronald Emrit v. Secretary, US Department of E, et al
as 20-11429
Defendant / Appellee:
NELNET, ACTION FINANCIAL SERVICES, BETSY DEVOS, Secretary United States Department of Education and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv00773
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ronald Emrit v. Betsy Devos, et al
as 20-11170
Defendant / Appellee:
BETSY DEVOS, Secretary, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, ACTION FINANCIAL SERVICES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv20697
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
EMRIT v. DEVOS et al
as 1:2020cv00034
Defendant:
ACTION FINANCIAL SERVICES, DEFAULT RESOLUTION GROUP, BETSY DEVOS and others
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00115
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
