Cases 11 - 20 of 50
RAMBO v. NOGAN et al
as 3:2014cv00874
Petitioner:
ROY L. RAMBO, JR.
Respondent:
BEVERLY HASTINGS and KEVIN M. O'DOWD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HINES v. LANIGAN et al
as 2:2014cv00359
Plaintiff:
ERIC HINES
Defendant:
GARY M. LANIGAN, CINDY FORD, KEVIN BOLDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. HASTINGS et al
as 2:2013cv06974
Plaintiff:
RANDY JOHNSON
Defendant:
BEVERLY HASTINGS and GRACE AMISTOSO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STILL v. HASTINGS et al
as 1:2013cv06226
Petitioner:
BRANDON STILL
Respondent:
BEVERLY HASTINGS and JOHN HOFFMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FLORES v. HASTINGS et al
as 2:2013cv05895
Petitioner:
JULIO FLORES
Respondent:
BEVERLY HASTINGS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NEWELL v. HASTINGS et al
as 2:2013cv05684
Petitioner:
MARVIN R. NEWELL
Respondent:
BEVERLY HASTINGS and JEFFREY CHIESA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JORDAN v. HASTINGS et al
as 3:2013cv05359
Petitioner:
MARC A. JORDAN
Respondent:
BEVERLY HASTINGS and JOHN HOFFMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JORDAN v. HASTINGS et al
as 3:2013cv05358
Petitioner:
MARC A. JORDAN
Respondent:
BEVERLY HASTINGS and JOHN HOFFMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JORDAN v. HASTINGS et al
as 3:2013cv05254
Petitioner:
MARC A. JORDAN
Respondent:
BEVERLY HASTINGS and JOHN HOFFMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MUHAMMAD v. HASTINGS et al
as 1:2013cv05278
Petitioner:
JAMAL MUHAMMAD
Respondent:
BEVERLY HASTINGS and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
