Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Young et al v. Zuckerberg et al
as 2:2021cv01710
Plaintiff:
La Shaun Mauquis Young, Loretta Young and Neisha Walker
Defendant:
Mark Zuckerberg, Louis Farrakhan, George W. Bush, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Warren v. George Bush et al
as 2:2008cv00962
Plaintiff:
Calvin Warren
Defendant:
George Bush, Bush Administration, Kelvin Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Warren et al v. Bush et al
as 2:2008cv00830
Plaintiff:
Calvin Warren and Administration under the President
Defendant:
George Bush, All Law Officers in America, Polices of North Las Vegas and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00821
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Caston et al v. ONeal et al
as 2:2008cv00059
Plaintiff:
Charles Caston and Shaunie Oneal
Defendant:
Shaquel ONeal, Miami Heat, Walgreens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
N.O.W. v. Oneal et al
as 2:2008cv00038
Plaintiff:
N.O.W.
Defendant:
Shaunie Oneal, George Washington University, Calico Creek Apartments and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Warren v. Bush et al
as 2:2008cv00018
Plaintiff:
Calvin Warren
Defendant:
George Bush, Bush Administration, Bill Clinton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Warren v. Bush et al
as 2:2008cv00016
Plaintiff:
Patrick Warren
Defendant:
George Bush, Bill Clinton, Billy Graham, Rev and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Caston et al v. U. S. President et al
as 2:2007cv00635
Plaintiff:
Charles Caston, I.R.S., Seamless and others
Defendant:
U. S. President, Senate, Congress and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Warren v. Graham et al
as 2:2007cv00599
Plaintiff:
Calvin Warren
Defendant:
Billy Graham, Rev, The Polices in Las Vegas and across America, George Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
