Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Bridges et al v. Chevron Phillips Chemical Company, LP et al
as 3:2013cv00477
Defendant:
Chevron Phillips Chemical Company, LP As successor in Interest to Phillips Chemical Company formerly known as ConocoPhillips also known as Phillips 66 Company doing business as Drilling Specialties Company, Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations, Inc., Union Carbide Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
David Bridges, John Courtney, Jerry Freeman, Sr. and others
Not Classified By Court:
David C. Gibbons and David Y. Lamm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv03140
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00332
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00331
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BJ Services Company USA v. Panalpina, Inc. et al
as 4:2008cv02000
Plaintiff:
BJ Services Company USA
Defendant:
Panalpina, Inc., Panalpina Denmark, Panalpina Welttransport GmbH and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00149
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00150
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00120
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00099
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
