Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Young v. BL Development Corp. et al
as 3:2019cv00034
Defendant:
ABC and DEF and BL Development Corp.
Plaintiff:
Hattie Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lavarias v. BL Development Corp.
as 3:2014cv00212
Plaintiff:
Brigitte A. Lavarias
Defendant:
BL Development Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hines v. BL Development Corp.
as 2:2012cv00059
Plaintiff:
Michelle A. Hines
Defendant:
BL Development Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barker et al v. Williams et al
as 2:2010cv00035
Plaintiff:
Michael Barker , Jobie C. Barker , William Thomas Ellis and others
Defendant:
Larry D. Williams, BL Development Corp., Harrah's Tunica Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Hipp et al v. BL Development Corp.
as 2:2009cv00012
Plaintiff:
Eddie Hipp, Janet Sauls and James Sauls
Defendant:
BL Development Corp.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Jacobs et al v. BL Development Corp. et al
as 2:2007cv00182
Plaintiff:
McKinley Jacobs, Isaac Clark, Billy Joe Lyons, Jr. and others
Defendant:
BL Development Corp., Grand Casinos, Inc. and Caesars Entertainment, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Maggette et al v. BL Development Corp. et al
as 2:2007cv00181
Plaintiff:
Deonne Maggette, Myrtle Bailey, Theophilus "Theo" Cannon and others
Defendant:
BL Development Corp., Grand Casinos, Inc. and Caesars Entertainment, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Rost et al v. Harrah's Entertainment, Inc. et al
as 2:2007cv00057
Plaintiff:
William C. Rost and Adelheid Rost
Defendant:
Harrah's Entertainment, Inc., Harrah's Operating Company, Inc., BL Development Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
