Cases 71 - 80 of 134
BMO HARRIS BANK N.A. v. SWIERBUT et al
as 1:2017cv02869
Plaintiff:
BMO HARRIS BANK N.A.
Defendant:
SWERBS FINANCIAL, INC., SWERBS MOTORS, INC. and ROGER A SWIERBUT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
BMO Harris Bank N.A. v. J-Lin Trucking, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv00045
Plaintiff:
BMO Harris Bank N.A.
Defendant:
J-Lin Trucking, Inc. and James Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
City of Genoa v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
as 1:2017cv03408
Defendant:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Plaintiff:
City of Genoa
Intervenor_plaintiff:
BMO Harris Bank N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BMO HARRIS BANK N.A. v. ELLINGTON
as 1:2017cv01159
Plaintiff:
BMO HARRIS BANK N.A.
Defendant:
SHARON HARRIS ELLINGTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
BMO Harris Bank N.A. v. Novak Druce Connolly Bove & Quigg LLP
as 1:2017cv00745
Plaintiff:
BMO Harris Bank N.A.
Defendant:
Novak Druce Connolly Bove & Quigg LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00509
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Derrick Tartt v. Magna Health Systems, et al
as 17-1023
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK B. TARTT
Defendant - Appellee:
MAGNA HEALTH SYSTEMS, DUPAGE ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY CENTER, SHELDON NAGELBERG and others
BMO Harris Bank N.A. v. Mariano
as 1:2016cv11600
Plaintiff:
BMO Harris Bank N.A.
Defendant:
Steven M Mariano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BMO HARRIS BANK N.A. v. BAKER & SIMMONS LOGISTICS, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv03208
Defendant:
BAKER & SIMMONS LOGISTICS, LLC, VICTOR LEAVELL and LEADRAIN MOORE
Plaintiff:
BMO HARRIS BANK N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
BMO Harris Bank N.A. v. Elizabeth Lailer, et al
as 16-3958
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BMO HARRIS BANK N.A.
Defendant - Appellant:
ELIZABETH LAILER and ROBERT W. BAIRD & COMPANY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
