Cases 1 - 10 of 12
BMO HARRIS BANK N.A. v. THAR PROCESS, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv00597
Plaintiff:
BMO HARRIS BANK N.A.
Defendant:
THAR PROCESS, INC., THAR EXTRACTS LLC, THAR SEPARATIONS LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
BMO HARRIS BANK, N.A. v. AZIM TRANSPORTATION INC. et al
as 2:2023cv00671
Defendant:
AZIM TRANSPORTATION INC, AZIM TRANS INC., A CORPORATION and AZIM MURADOV
Plaintiff:
BMO HARRIS BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
BMO Harris Bank N.A. v. JRD Trucking, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv02161
Plaintiff:
BMO Harris Bank N.A.
Defendant:
JRD Trucking, LLC and Richard Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
BMO Harris Bank N.A. v. Shepherd
as 3:2021cv01901
Plaintiff:
BMO Harris Bank N.A.
Defendant:
Joseph Shepherd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BMO HARRIS BANK N.A. v. Ezel Logistics LLC et al
as 2:2020cv04239
Defendant:
Ezel Logistics LLC and Kamal Khasanov
Plaintiff:
BMO HARRIS BANK N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BMO HARRIS BANK N.A. v. ROGERS
as 2:2019cv01427
Defendant:
WILLIAM J. ROGERS
Plaintiff:
BMO HARRIS BANK N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BMO HARRIS BANK N.A. v. SYNERGISTIKS INC. et al
as 2:2018mc00450
Plaintiff:
BMO HARRIS BANK N.A.
Defendant:
SYNERGISTIKS INC. and ROBERT WILLIAMSON
BMO HARRIS BANK, N.A. v. BARTOLI
as 2:2016cv01660
Plaintiff:
BMO HARRIS BANK, N.A.
Defendant:
EDWARD BARTOLI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
BMO HARRIS BANK N.A. v. THE TRULAND GROUP, INC. et al
as 2:2014mc00399
Plaintiff:
BMO HARRIS BANK N.A.
Defendant:
THE TRULAND GROUP, INC., TRULAND SYSTEMS CORPORATION, PEL-BERN ELECTRIC CORPORATION and others
Receiver:
RAYMOND A. YANCEY
BMO Harris Bank N.A. v. The Truland Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2014mc00552
Plaintiff:
BMO Harris Bank N.A.
Defendant:
The Truland Group, Inc., Truland Systems Corporation, Pel-Bern Electric Corporation and others
Receiver:
Raymond A Yancey
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
