Cases 1 - 10 of 111
AMERICAN ZINC RECYCLING CORP. v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY et al
as 2:2020cv06483
Defendant:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN ZINC RECYCLING CORP.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC. v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY et al
as 5:2020cv03223
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, UNION PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
CERTAINTEED CORPORATION et al v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY et al
as 2:2019cv04523
Plaintiff:
CERTAINTEED GYPSUM NC, INC., CERTAINTEED GYPSUM WEST VIRGINIA, INC., CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, CST TRANSPORTATION, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
THOMAS v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2016cv00910
Plaintiff:
RHONDA THOMAS
Defendant:
BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
MILBERRY v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2011cv67783
Plaintiff:
THOMAS MILBERRY
Defendant:
BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROHR v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2011cv67761
Plaintiff:
AMY ROHR
Defendant:
BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
JURKOVICH v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2011cv67701
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH JURKOVICH
Defendant:
BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WASHINGTON v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2011cv67703
Plaintiff:
JACK WASHINGTON
Defendant:
BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIS v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2011cv67702
Plaintiff:
CHARLES L. DAVIS
Defendant:
BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WHITEHEAD v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2011cv67686
Plaintiff:
RICKEY G. WHITEHEAD
Defendant:
BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
