Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00648
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bonds v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv01266
Plaintiff:
Alicia Bonds
Defendant:
Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC, Atrium Medical Corporation and Getinge AB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00798
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Bond v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv00781
Defendant:
Getinge AB, Atrium Medical Corporation and Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Bond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015fp00372
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Federal Trade Commission v. Bunzai Media Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2015mc00040
Defendant:
AMD Financial Network, Inc., Adageo, LLC, Agoa Holdings, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Receiver:
Charlene C. Koonce
Richard Boudreau et al v. Sorat et al
as 1:2008cv00416
Plaintiff:
USA, ex rel, State of California, ex rel, Richard Boudreau and others
Defendant:
Cyrus Sorat, Health Care Pharmacy, Vicis Capital, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Merchants Bonding Company v. MW Builders, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00265
Defendant:
A.D. Associated Drywall, Co., Inc., Anthony E. Dionne, Kimberly Dionne and others
Plaintiff:
Merchants Bonding Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Bond v. Magrosky
as 1:2011cv00523
Plaintiff:
Michael Bond
Defendant:
Jennifer Magrosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00179
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
