Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Booth v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Manatee)
as 8:2024cv00336
Petitioner:
Roosevelt Charles Booth
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MCKENZIE v. LOVE et al
as 4:2023cv00198
Plaintiff:
TABITHA MEGAN MCKENZIE and CASEY TIDWELL BARREN
Defendant:
ERIC LOVE, RON DESANTIS, NEAL DUNN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BERRY v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2023cv05677
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN BURKE BERRY
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RICKY DIXON, Z CULPEPPER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FULFORD v. BOOTH et al
as 5:2022cv00138
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER FULFORD
Defendant:
ERIC BOOTH, DICKSON, MELVIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOVELACE v. INCH et al
as 3:2022cv00475
Plaintiff:
LAZAVIER L LOVELACE
Defendant:
MARK INCH, HEAR, BOOTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOVELACE v. INCH et al
as 5:2022cv00009
Plaintiff:
LAZAVIER L LOVELACE
Defendant:
MARK INCH, HEAR, BOOTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AUGUSTINE v. INCH et al
as 4:2021cv00123
Defendant:
MARK INCH, DAVIS, BAINE and others
Plaintiff:
JULIO AUGUSTINE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Selden v. O'Neil et al
as 8:2021cv00325
Respondent:
Patricia Ann Booth McCarthy and Robert E. O'Neil
Petitioner:
Glenn Lee Selden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Nurain et al v. Florida Department Of Corrections et al
as 2:2020cv00353
Plaintiff:
Robert Leon Holland, Jr., Dhun Nurain and Michael Leon Hall
Defendant:
Shelly Baker, Kenneth Steele, Florida Department Of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ZEWIEY v. BOOTH et al
as 3:2020cv03770
Defendant:
BOOTH, JOHN HASSETT and BRANTLEY
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE M ZEWIEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
