Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Soto v. North Eastern Ohio Correctional Center et al
as 4:2014cv00297
Plaintiff:
Eden Soto
Defendant:
North Eastern Ohio Correctional Center, Federal BOP and U.S. Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frye v. BOP Staff et al
as 1:2013cv02774
Plaintiff:
Matthew Frye, Jr.
Defendant:
BOP Staff, Jr. Bell, Counselor Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Attanasio v. United States Dept. Justice BOP
as 4:2013cv01954
Petitioner:
Louis Attanasio
Respondent:
United States Dept. Justice BOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Castillo-DeLeon v. Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons - BOP Central Office
as 4:2012cv00186
Petitioner:
Javier Castillo-DeLeon
Respondent:
Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons - BOP Central Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Riascos v. Rushing et al
as 4:2009cv01564
Petitioner:
Omar Riascos
Respondent:
Roddie Rushing, USA, NEOCC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Maxwell v. CCA et al
as 4:2009cv01212
Petitioner:
Lloyd George Maxwell
Respondent:
CCA, BOP, United States and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Elcheikhali v. Gujo et al
as 4:2009cv00471
Petitioner:
Abbas Elcheikhali
Respondent:
MJ Gujo, BOP, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Corporan v. Federal Bureau of Prison (BOP) et al
as 4:2008cv02389
Petitioner:
Patricio Corporan
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prison (BOP), Omairo Alvelo and Joseph Gonja
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hugh v. CCA et al
as 4:2008cv02384
Respondent:
CCA, BOP, United States and others
Petitioner:
Derrick Dehaney Hugh
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Walder v. United States et al
as 4:2008cv02376
Petitioner:
Hanspeter Walder
Respondent:
United States, BOP, CCA and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
