Cases
Dickey v. City of Boston, et al
as 19-2045
Plaintiff / Appellant: JAMES DICKEY
Defendant / Appellee: JEFFREY WINIK, in his official capacity as judge for the Housing Court, STUART TED SCHRIER, in his official capacity as Receiver, MARIA THEOPHILIS, in her official capacity as judge for Housing Court and others
Dickey v. Boston, MA, et al
as 17-1094
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAMES DICKEY
Defendant - Appellee: BOSTON, MA, Through the Inspectional Service Department, EDWARD COBURN, individually and in his official capacity as lawyer for the City of Boston, JAMES JOSEPH COTTER, III, individually and in his official capacity as receiver for the Boston Housing Court and others
Defendant: STEVEN AMARAL and KATIE AMARAL
Type: Other Statutes RICO
Dickey v. Boston, MA, et al
as 16-1962
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAMES DICKEY
Defendant - Appellee: BOSTON, MA, through the Inspectional Service Department, EDWARD COBURN, individually and in his official capacity as lawyer for the City of Boston, JAMES JOSEPH COTTER, III, individually and in his official capacity as receiver for the Boston Housing Court and others
Type: Other Statutes RICO
In re: Dickey
as 16-1799
Petitioner: JAMES DICKEY
Respondent: BOSTON, MA, through the Inspectional Service Department, EDWARD COBURN, individually and in his official capacity as lawyer for the City of Boston, JAMES JOSEPH COTTER, III, individually and in his official capacity as receiver for the Boston Housing Court and others
Dickey v. Boston, MA, et al
as 16-1585
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAMES DICKEY
Defendant - Appellee: BOSTON, MA, through the Inspectional Service Department, EDWARD COBURN, individually and in his official capacity as lawyer for the City of Boston, JAMES JOSEPH COTTER, III, individually and in his official capacity as receiver for the Boston Housing Court and others
Type: Other Statutes RICO

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?