Cases 1 - 10 of 209
Bowens v. The Kroger Co.
as 1:2024cv01913
Plaintiff:
Nicole Bowens
Defendant:
The Kroger Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Bowen v. Rosie's Cafe, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Adrian Bowen
Defendant:
Rosie's Cafe, LLC, Erica Platt and Platt Restaurant Group
DAVIS v. BOWEN et al
as 5:2024cv00104
Petitioner:
NORMAN DAVIS
Respondent:
Warden TOMMY BOWEN and CENTRAL STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bowens v. Allen
as 1:2023cv05689
Petitioner:
Rodqucus Bowens and Rodqueus Bowens
Respondent:
Marty Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bowen v. The Clorox Company
as 1:2023cv05584
Plaintiff:
David Bowen
Defendant:
The Clorox Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability
Crowder et al v. Kemp et al
as 1:2023cv04732
Plaintiff:
Donald Crowder, Solomon Thompson, Timothy Bowen and others
Defendant:
Brian Kemp, Terry E. Barnard, Jacqueline Bunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Markel Insurance Company v. Bowen et al
as 3:2023cv00088
Plaintiff:
Markel Insurance Company
Defendant:
Courtney Bowen, K.J.K. and Samantha Humphrey
Counter Claimant:
Justin Kibby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
WHITTENBURG v. OLIVER et al
as 4:2023cv00067
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HOYT WHITTENBURG
Defendant:
Tyrone Oliver and Tommy Bowen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Whittenburg v. Oliver et al
as 4:2023cv00048
Petitioner:
William Hoyt Whittenburg
Respondent:
Tyrone Oliver and Tommy Bowen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WHITTENBURG v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2023cv00101
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HOYT WHITTENBURG
Defendant:
TYRONE OLIVER and Warden TOMMY BOWEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
