Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Kui Myles v. USA, et al
as 20-55910
Defendant / Appellee:
ARACELI TREVINO, DAVID MARIN, BRIAN DEMORE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KUI Z. MYLES
Kui Z Myles v. The United States of America et al
as 5:2019cv02036
Plaintiff:
Kui Z Myles
Defendant:
Steven Lovett, Does 1 - 50, inclusive., David Marin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Jia Xing Wang v. Michael Mukasey et al
as 2:2008cv07332
Respondent:
Lee Baca, Dennis Burns, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv05097
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv03538
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv01023
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00974
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00851
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Cheng Wen Zhu v. Michael Mukasey et al
as 2:2008cv08533
Respondent:
Lee Baca, Dennis Burns, Michael Chertoff and others
Petitioner:
Cheng Wen Zhu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv08522
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
