Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Jamaal Bilal v. Brian Masony, et al
as 24-14224
Defendant:
KERI FITZPATRICK, KRISTEN KANNER and BRIAN MASONY
Plaintiff:
JAMAAL ALI BILAL
Freeze v. Sawyer et al
as 2:2018cv00310
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Freeze
Defendant:
Donald Sawyer, Rebecca Jackson, Danielle E. Koskey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abaunza v. Geo Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv00194
Plaintiff:
Alvaro Abaunza
Defendant:
Geo Group, Inc., Correct Care Recovery Solutions, George Zoley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Geo Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv00036
Plaintiff:
Gregory O'Neil Henderson
Defendant:
Geo Group, Inc., Mike Carroll, George Zoley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jamaal Bilal v. Brian Masony, et al
as 16-17329
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMAAL ALI BILAL
Defendant - Appellee:
BRIAN MASONY, Esquire, CCS-GEO General Counsel, KERI FITZPATRICK, CCS-GEO Law Librarian, KERI FITZPATRICK, SVP - Director, Department of Children & Families and others
Brzozowski v. GEO Care, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv00826
Plaintiff:
Robert Brzozowski
Defendant:
GEO Care, LLC, Correctional Care Recovery Solutions, Inc., Donald Sawyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abaunza v. GEO Group Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00812
Plaintiff:
Alvaro Abaunza
Defendant:
GEO Group Inc., Correct Care Recovery Solutions, George Zoley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bilal v. Masony et al
as 2:2016cv00786
Plaintiff:
Jamaal Ali Bilal
Defendant:
Brian Masony, Keri Fitzpatrick and Kristen Kanner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gering v. GEO Group Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00267
Plaintiff:
Robert Gering
Defendant:
GEO Group Inc., Mike Carroll, George Zoley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burton v. GEO Group et al
as 2:2016cv00060
Plaintiff:
Gary Burton
Defendant:
GEO Group Inc., Mike Carroll, George Zoley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
