Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Brooks v. Breckinridge County Detention Center et al
as 3:2021cv00088
Plaintiff:
Broderick Brooks
Defendant:
T. Shrewsberry and Breckinridge County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Louisville Metro Dept. of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv00087
Plaintiff:
Broderick Brooks
Defendant:
Deputy Director Martin Baker and Louisville Metro Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Breckinridge County Detention Center et al
as 3:2021cv00024
Plaintiff:
Broderick Brooks
Defendant:
T. Shrewsberry and Breckinridge County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00363
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Wooters v. USA
as 6:2019cv00007
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Broderick Wooters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Duvall et al v. USA et al
as 3:2019cv00002
Defendant:
Women's Care of the Bluegrass/Cumberland Family Medical Center, Inc. and USA
Plaintiff:
Leah K. Duvall and Broderick T. Redden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Duvall et al v. Women's Care of the Bluegrass, PLLC
as 3:2018cv00048
Defendant:
Women's Care of the Bluegrass, PLLC and USA
Plaintiff:
Leah K. Duvall and Broderick T. Redden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00128
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Simmons et al v. Skechers USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00468
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Simmons , Debbie Barger , Jacqueline Betts and others
Defendant:
Skechers U.S.A., Inc. , Skechers U.S.A., Inc. II and Skechers Fitness Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lawrence v. Brown et al
as 1:2015cv00011
Plaintiff:
Marcus J. Lawrence
Defendant:
John B. Brown, Brent J. Potter, Catherine R. Holderfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
