Civil Rights Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 24
TATUM v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2024cv00033
Plaintiff: THOMAS TATUM
Defendant: JOSEPH BIDEN, METROPOLITAN POLICE, DANIEL THAU and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
VARGO v. WILLIAMS et al
as 1:2024cv00010
Plaintiff: DERRICK VARGO
Defendant: BRYANT WILLIAMS and JAMES MICHAEL JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02313
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
ETIENNE v. SANDERS et al
as 1:2022cv02509
Defendant: KAREN REA PERKINS, MACHELLE SANDERS, TAMMIE ELAINE HALL and others
Plaintiff: DINEEN CHERYLANN ETIENNE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
AZUBUKO v. BRYANT et al
as 1:2021cv02450
Plaintiff: CHUKWUMA E. AZUBUKO
Defendant: VANESSA L. BRYANT and THOMAS P. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
PANTOJA et al v. MARTINEZ et al
as 1:2021cv02197
Plaintiff: SITO PANTOJA, MARIA TUSA, EDMUND A WALSH and others
Defendant: ROBERT MARTINEZ, DORA CERVANTES, GARY R. ALLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0401
OKEREKE v. HENRY et al
as 1:2019cv03577
Defendant: VANESSA LYNNE BRYANT, BRUCE E. HENRY, KATHRIN B. DIRKS and others
Plaintiff: PRECIOUS OKEREKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BRAXTON v. ELSIE WHITLOW STOKES COMMUNITY FREEDOM PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL et al
as 1:2019cv02291
Plaintiff: NYKIA BRAXTON
Defendant: ELSIE WHITLOW STOKES COMMUNITY FREEDOM PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL, ERIKA BRYANT and ERICA MCGRADY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03018
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02123
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?