Cases 11 - 20 of 52
TAYLOR v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY
as 1:2019cv08772
Respondent:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Petitioner:
BRYANT D. TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BRYANT v. TRAENDLY et al
as 3:2019cv04758
Defendant:
TANIA LARKIN, NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD and MICHAEL TRAENDLY
Plaintiff:
PIERCE BRYANT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMART v. BORO OF SOMERDALE et al
as 1:2019cv00044
Defendant:
PATROLMAN S. BRYANT, POLICE CHIEF JOHN DOE, TASHA ALI and others
Plaintiff:
SALAHUDDIN F. SMART
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GLADDEN v. NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE et al
as 3:2018cv13363
Defendant:
JOHN CIPOT, ANDREW OLIVARAH, DAN COLLONEY and others
Plaintiff:
CARAN A. GLADDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRYANT v. NOGAN et al
as 2:2018cv02701
Petitioner:
JERMAINE L. BRYANT
Respondent:
PATRICK NOGAN and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BRYANT v. SALEM COUNTY et al
as 1:2018cv00837
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER BRYANT
Defendant:
SALEM COUNTY , MARTIN , RAYMOND SKRADZINSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRYANT v. EARLING et al
as 1:2018cv00623
Plaintiff:
PONTELL BRYANT
Defendant:
BARBARA EARLING, WILLIE BONDS and KIPPIE KANGFORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRYANT v. NOGAN et al
as 2:2017cv05606
Respondent:
PATRICK NOGAN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Petitioner:
JERMAINE L. BRYANT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BANKS v. PIERCE et al
as 1:2017cv02961
Petitioner:
BRYANT BANKS, SR.
Respondent:
DAVID PIERCE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WALLACE v. BRYANT et al
as 3:2017cv01416
Plaintiff:
JAMIE WALLACE
Defendant:
CALVIN BRYANT, GEORGE HANICHUK and TRAYHAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
