Cases 31 - 40 of 50
Adams et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 1:2018cv01238
Plaintiff:
Mary D. Wallace, Paul Berry, Nathan Brown and others
Petitioner:
Kara Allen
Defendant:
Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc., Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bryant v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 1:2017cv01106
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Pfizer Inc.
Plaintiff:
Bruce Bryant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Bryant v. Connections et al
as 1:2017cv01080
Plaintiff:
Cedric L. Bryant
Defendant:
Connections, Clauda Pierce, Brad Boyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Caple et al
as 1:2017cv00363
Plaintiff:
Tiera Tramaine Smith
Defendant:
Wendi Caple, Bryant Emig, Faith Levy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dorsey v. United States of America
as 1:2017cv00182
Plaintiff:
Bryant K. Dorsey
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Bryant et al v. Sanofi U.S. Services Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv01193
Plaintiff:
Mary Bryant and Otis L. Bryant
Defendant:
Sanofi U.S. Services Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC , Hospira Worldwide, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Young v. Dorsey et al
as 1:2016cv00758
Plaintiff:
Sequoia Young
Defendant:
Bryant Dorsey and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Young v. Dorsey et al
as 1:2016cv00744
Plaintiff:
Sequoia R. Young
Defendant:
Bryant Dorsey and Mark Grajewski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Bryant v. HRYCI Mental Health Department
as 1:2016cv00613
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Bryant
Defendant:
HRYCI Mental Health Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryant v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 1:2013cv01833
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company , Sanofi-Aventis US LLC , Sanofi US Services Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Carl R. Bryant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
