Cases 31 - 40 of 78
ESTATE OF BYRON W. FOUTY et al v. SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC et al
as 1:2018cv00385
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF BYRON W. FOUTY , MARIA DURAN , RAMON D. JIMENEZ and others
Defendant:
SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC, SYRIAN MILITARY INTELLIGENCE and BASHAR AL-ASAD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1602
BRYANT v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2018cv00176
Plaintiff:
RONNIE LEON BRYANT
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GOVERNMENT, METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, SARAH R. BUC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRYANT v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2017cv01995
Plaintiff:
SOLLIAH BRYANT
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. , IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GRIMES v. CLEARLY-TROMBLY et al
as 1:2017cv01378
Plaintiff:
JEROME L. GRIMES
Defendant:
AMI CLEARLY-TROMBLY, PIK CHOI, CHAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRYANT v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2017cv01289
Plaintiff:
RONNIE L. BRYANT
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPT. and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WEBB-EL
as 1:2017cv01111
Plaintiff:
KEITH BRYANT WEBB-EL
Defendant:
THOMAS R. KANE, J. PATRICIA WILSON SMOOT, A. SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00424
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BRYANT v. WELLS FARGO BANK & CO. et al
as 1:2016cv02451
Plaintiff:
RONNIE LEON BRYANT
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK & COMPANY, JOHN STUMPF, STEPHEN SANGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRYANT v. UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE
as 1:2016mc02465
Petitioner:
VICTORIA BRYANT
Respondent:
UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
BRYANT v. COLVIN
as 1:2016cv02196
Plaintiff:
LILLIE L. BRYANT
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
