Cases 1 - 10 of 19
TOMLINSON et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2023cv00297
Plaintiff:
DOES 1 through 23, MELANIE TOMLINSON, KATHRYN GREENLEE and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, ISLAMIC REVOLUTIONARY GUARD CORPS, SHAHID BAKERI INDUSTRIAL GROUP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
BULLOCK v. HANA SECURITY SERVICES et al
as 1:2022cv02608
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BULLOCK
Defendant:
HANA SECURITY SERVICES, SAM ESTES, RONALD BEST and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01099
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
BULLOCK v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv01764
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Plaintiff:
PAUL BULLOCK
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427
BENJAMIN v. HICKS et al
as 1:2018cv00864
Plaintiff:
LOPEZ P. BENJAMIN
Defendant:
HICKS, HOYLE, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SELLERS v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2016cv02271
Plaintiff:
DONNIE MACK SELLERS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
BULLOCK v. AMERICAN SECURITY PROGRAMS, INC.
as 1:2016cv01645
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BULLOCK
Defendant:
AMERICAN SECURITY PROGRAMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00480
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Viol. of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01543
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
BULLOCK v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY et al
as 1:2012cv00985
Plaintiff:
DARYL L. BULLOCK
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY and M. E. MCKINNEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
