Cases 41 - 50 of 91
Watson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2012cv03091
Plaintiff:
Pierre Terron-Oneal Watson
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Josh Evans, Lisa Hollingsworth and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Perry v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2012cv03086
Plaintiff:
Jason L. Perry
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, J. Loftness, D. Treadway and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stine v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2011cv03096
Plaintiff:
Mikeal Glenn Stine
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Michael K. Nalley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bowman et al v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2011cv03047
Plaintiff:
Christopher Wayne Bowman and Mikeal Glenn Stine
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Michael K. Nalley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cox v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2011cv03017
Petitioner:
Welby Thomas Cox
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and C. Chester
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
White v. Chester et al
as 5:2010cv03222
Petitioner:
Paul White
Respondent:
Claude Chester and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dalton v. United States of America et al
as 5:2010cv03165
Petitioner:
Timothy S. Dalton
Respondent:
United States of America and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Stine v. George et al
as 5:2010cv03151
Plaintiff:
Mikeal Glenn Stine
Defendant:
(fnu) George, U.S. Bureau of Prisons and Michael K. Nalley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rusan-El v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2010cv03124
Petitioner:
Ricardo Lamont Rusan-El
Respondent:
United States Bureau of Prisons, United States Penitentiary of Leavenworth and Claude Chester
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Amerson Bey v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2010cv03122
Petitioner:
Raymond Amerson Bey, Jr.
Respondent:
United States Bureau of Prisons, United States Penitentiary of Leavenworth and Claude Chester
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
