Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Burger King Corporation v. Darryl Berry, et al
as 21-10180
Defendant / Appellant:
DARRYL B. BERRY and CAPITAL RESTAURANT GROUP, LLC
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BURGER KING CORPORATION
Jarvis Arrington, et al v. BKW, et al
as 20-13561
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JARVIS ARRINGTON, GENEVA BLANCHARD and SANDRA MUNSTER, c/o Morgan and Morgan 201 North Franklin Street 7th Floor Tampa, FL 33602 813-223-5505
Defendant / Appellee:
RESTAURANT BRANDS INTERNATIONAL INC., BURGER KING WORLDWIDE, INC. and BURGER KING CORPORATION
Phillip Williams, et al v. Burger King Corporation
as 20-13128
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALI BEY, CHRISTOPHER MCGEE, MARIE VENTER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BURGER KING CORPORATION
Daniel Bitton v. Burger King, et al
as 15-13305
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL BITTON
Defendant - Appellee:
BURGER KING, STARBUCKS CORPORATION, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-15205
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-12540
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Burger King Corporation v. Broad Street Licensing Group
as 11-14377
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BURGER KING CORPORATION
Defendant - Appellant:
BROAD STREET LICENSING GROUP, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-13056
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nat'l Franchisee Association, et al v. Burger King Corporation
as 10-15839
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATIONAL FRANCHISEE ASSOCIATION, a Nevada corporation, on behalf of its members and on behalf of a class composed of all Burger King franchisees located in the Untied States, FAMILY DINING, INC., RESTAURANT ASSOCIATES OF CINCINNATI, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
BURGER KING CORPORATION, a Floridia corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
