Cases 1 - 7 of 7
ESTATE OF WILLIAM BECZO v. PORT LUMBER CORP. et al
as 3:2023cv01338
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF BECZO, DECEASED and ESTATE OF WILLIAM BECZO
Defendant:
PORT LUMBER CORP. and GEORGE BAGWELL, JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
BAGWELL v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2021cv17573
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
PAULA BAGWELL
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BAGWELL v. ASTRAZENECA LP et al
as 2:2021cv14067
Plaintiff:
SUSAN BAGWELL
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA LP, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION and others
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (NO.II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BAGWELL v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv19249
Plaintiff:
DORA BAGWELL
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BAGWELL v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON
as 3:2018cv14988
Plaintiff:
Mrs. Janet Leigh Bagwell and JANET LEIGH BAGWELL
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. F/K/A JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv05377
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP. v. BAGWELL et al
as 2:2016cv01980
Plaintiff:
HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP.
Defendant:
BRIAN BAGWELL , CASEY LANHAM and INFORMD MEDICAL DISTRIBUTORS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
