Cases 1 - 10 of 151
BAILEY v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2024cv01219
Plaintiff:
Pamela BAILEY d/b/a More Than Our Crimes
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
In re: Chantal Attias, et al
as 24-8001
Petitioner:
In re: Chantal Attias, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Richard Bailey, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Latanya Bailey, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00688
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
TERRELL v. BAILEY et al
as 1:2024cv00505
Plaintiff:
LORI E. TERRELL
Defendant:
CHERYL R. BAILEY, LAURA A. CORDERO, ZABRINA W. DEMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA, et al v. Veterans Medical Transcription Services, Inc., et al
as 23-7171
Plaintiff:
United States of America, ex rel. Thomas Bailey, Thomas Erik Bailey and Thomas Bailey
Defendant:
Veterans Medical Transcription Services, Inc., Stone Network, Inc., Steven Rose and others
USA v. Brian Bailey
as 23-3211
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Brian Winston Bailey
BAILEY v. METRO TRANSIT ACCESSIBILITY OFFICE
as 1:2023cv02889
Plaintiff:
BRENDA ANN BAILEY
Defendant:
METRO TRANSIT ACCESSIBILITY OFFICE
Charles Hester v. Charlotte Burrows, et al
as 22-5312
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Charles Hester
Defendant / Appellee:
Charlotte A. Burrows, Chair, Janet Dhillon, Commissioner, Victoria Ann Lipnic, Commissioner and others
BAKER et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2022cv02765
Plaintiff:
NAMIG BAKER, IRINA GORODNITSKY,, GLENN BAKER and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
