Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Great Divide Insurance Company v. Baker Hughes et al
as 4:2023cv02548
Plaintiff:
Great Divide Insurance Company
Defendant:
Baker Hughes, A GE Company, LLC, Baker Petrolite, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Baker Hughes Incorporated et al v. Stevens et al
as 4:2015mc01597
Defendant:
Bruce Neal Stevens, SPE Wax Technologies, LLC and S&S Chemical, LLC
Plaintiff:
Baker Hughes Incorporated and Baker Petrolite Corporation
Movant:
The International Group, Inc.
Baker Petrolite Corp. et al v. S&S Chemical, LLC et al
as 4:2015mc01575
Plaintiff:
Baker Petrolite Corp. and Baker Hughes Inc.
Defendant:
S&S Chemical, LLC, Bruce Neal Stevens and SPE Wax Technologies, LLC
Movant:
TM Chemicals Limited Partnership
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00889
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00891
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Supply Chain Connect, LLC v. Afton Chemical Corporation et al
as 4:2011cv02191
Plaintiff:
Supply Chain Connect, LLC
Defendant:
Afton Chemical Corporation , Airgas, Inc., Air Liquide America, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Baker Petrolite Corporation v. Myers
as 4:2009cv01216
Plaintiff:
Baker Petrolite Corporation
Defendant:
Ronald Gene Myers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Baker Petrolite Corporation v. Knight
as 4:2008cv03331
Plaintiff:
Baker Petrolite Corporation
Defendant:
Kenneth Knight
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv02182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
