Cases 1 - 7 of 7
DUENAS v. The Individuals, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A.
as 1:2023cv21365
Plaintiff:
NORMAN DUENAS
Defendant:
The Individuals, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A., Banggood, gor2don Store and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0501 Copyright Infringement
Tetris Holding, LLC v. Partnerships and Unincorporated Association Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2022cv00651
Plaintiff:
Tetris Holding, LLC, Shantou Chenghai Hancheng Toy Industry Co., Ltd. and Shennzhen Elecview Technology Co., Ltd
Defendant:
Partnerships and Unincorporated Association Identified on Schedule "A", 001 Dropshipping Store, 03shop and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Pink Floyd v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2021cv00296
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", FangGuoQunFG, zengli1006 and others
Plaintiff:
PINK FLOYD (1987) LIMITED and Pink Floyd
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Gorge Design Group LLC, et al v. Syarme, et al
as 21-1074
Defendant:
CAMPMAX, MOTIONCOMM, SYARME and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KIRBY ERDELY and GORGE DESIGN GROUP LLC
Defendant / Appellant:
NEOMAGIC CORP, DBA Mercadomagico.com
Oakley, Inc. v. Guangzhou Banggood Technology Co., Ltd.
as 1:2019cv03996
Plaintiff:
Oakley, Inc.
Defendant:
Guangzhou Banggood Technology Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Oakley, Inc. v. Guangzhou Banggood Technology Co., Ltd.
as 1:2018cv01943
Plaintiff:
Oakley, Inc.
Defendant:
Guangzhou Banggood Technology Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Twenty-First Century Technologies, Inc. v. Banggood Network Technology Co., Ltd.
as 1:2015cv01078
Defendant:
Banggood Network Technology Co., Ltd.
Plaintiff:
Twenty-First Century Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
