Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Back v. Bank Hapoalim, B.M.
as 24-1064
Plaintiff:
SOL BACK
Defendant:
BANK HAPOALIM, B.M. and GIL KARNI
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ed Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03655
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ed
Coperatieve Rabobank U.A., New York Branch et al v. EisnerAmper LLP
as 1:2020cv04071
Defendant:
Eisneramper LLP
Plaintiff:
Mitsubishi International Corporation, Brown Brothers Harriman & Co., Athilon Capital Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 nr
Cooperatieve Rabobank U.A., New York Branch et al v. Crowe LLP
as 1:2020cv01556
Plaintiff:
Mitsubishi International Corporation, Woodforest National Bank, Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. and others
Defendant:
Crowe LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 nr
In Re: Irving H. Picard, Trust
as 17-3072
Intervenor:
Securities Investor Protection Corporation
Appellant:
Irving H. Picard, Trustee for the Liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC
Appellee:
Bank Hapoalim (Switzerland) Ltd. and Bank Hapoalim B.M.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-3072
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv05659
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Picard v. Bank Hapoalim B.M.
as 17-1368
Petitioner:
Irving H. Picard, Trustee for the Liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC
Respondent:
Bank Hapoalim B.M. and Bank Hapoalim (Switzerland) Ltd.
Picard v. Bank Hapoalim B.M.
as 17-1368
Petitioner:
Irving H. Picard, Trustee for the Liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC
Respondent:
Bank Hapoalim B.M. and Bank Hapoalim (Switzerland) Ltd.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
