Cases 1 - 5 of 5
United States v. Check for $19,051
as 3:2022cv01323
Petitioner:
United States
Defendant:
Check for $19,051.00 from Remaining Value on Group of Nine VISA Bank of America Cards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341 Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. $22,774.47 seized from Bank of America Acct. No. 002375767173 in the name of Olu Amoda
as 3:2014cv01831
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$22,774.47 seized from Bank of America Acct. No. 002375767173 in the name of Olu Amoda
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. $24,200.00 in U.S. Currency et al
as 3:2012cv01871
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$24,200.00 in U.S. Currency, $1,768,326.92 in U.S. Currency converted from Iraqi Dinar, $2,630.00 in U.S. Currency and others
Claimant:
Michael Teadt and Bradford L. Huebner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341
United States of America v. One Million Two Hundred Eight-Two Thousand Three Hundred Sixty and 00/100 Dollars ($1,282,360.00) in United States Currency et al
as 2:2011cv00570
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
One Million Two Hundred Eight-Two Thousand Three Hundred Sixty and 00/100 Dollars ($1,282,360.00) in United States Currency, Two (2) JP Morgan Chase Bank Cashier's Checks Totalling Fifty-Two Thousand Four Hundred Sixty-Six and 32/100 Dollars ($52,466.32), Ninteen (19) Assorted Money Orders, Totaling Sixteen Thousand Four Hundred Sixty and 00/100 Dollars ($16,460.00) and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. Bank of America Acct No. ending in 9409, In the Name of David P. Stone, All Contents
as 3:2007cv00169
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Bank of America Acct. No. ending in 9409, In the Name of David P. Stone, All Contents
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
