Cases 11 - 20 of 112
In Re: Request from Argentina
as 1:2023mc00224
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Bank of America N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
In Re: Request from Argentina
as 1:2023mc00147
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Sandra Ines Gerchunoff, DESPEGAR.COM.AR S.A. and Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
In Re: Request from Argentina
as 1:2022mc00592
Petitioner:
USA
Respondent:
Bank of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
In Re: Request from Slovak Republic
as 1:2022mc00593
Petitioner:
USA
Respondent:
Teodor Bezak and Bank of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
In re: Letter of Request from Argentina
as 1:2022mc00565
Petitioner:
United States Attorney for the District of Delaware
Respondent:
Bank of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
In Re: Letter Request from Argentina
as 1:2022mc00514
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Bank of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
Cherricks v. Bank of America
as 1:2022cv01331
Plaintiff:
Liza Dawn Cherricks
Defendant:
Bank of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In Re: Ex Parte Application of Alesayi Beverage Company, Ltd.
as 1:2022mc00285
Petitioner:
Alesayi Beverage Company, Ltd.
Respondent:
Bank of America N.A. and JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
Webb v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv00670
Plaintiff:
David Q. Webb
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation and Melissa Anne Greller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00614
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
