Cases 11 - 20 of 92
Bank of America, N.A. v. The Reserve, LLC et al
as 2:2017mc00220
Plaintiff:
Bank of America, N.A.
Defendant:
The Reserve, LLC and William Jason Townsend
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02526
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv04007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Patel v. Chilson et al
as 6:2016cv01428
Plaintiff:
Kamal K. Patel
Defendant:
Andrew Chilson, Kozeny & McCubbin, L.C. and Bank of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Eric D. Keller v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 2:2016cv02538
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Eric David Keller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davis v. Bank of America et al
as 2:2016cv02506
Plaintiff:
Ronald E. Davis
Defendant:
Bank of America , Franchise Tax Board , Bank of America National Board of Directors and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
In Re: Bank of America Wage and Hour Employment Practices Litigation
as 2:2010md02138
In Re:
Bank of America Wage and Hour Employment Practices Litigation and All Plaintiffs (for Lead/Liaison Counsel ONLY)
Plaintiff:
Amanda Brawner, Gynon Hamilton, LaVonda R. Edwards and others
Defendant:
Bank of America, NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407
Richardson v. U.S. Attorney General et al
as 5:2015cv04900
Plaintiff:
John C Richardson
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney General, Barack Obama, Treasury, Department of the United States, Secretary of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv09115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Larkin et al v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 6:2015cv01151
Plaintiff:
Mark S. Larkin and Caroline M. Larkin
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
