Cases 1 - 7 of 7
RUBINSTEIN et al v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. et al
as 2:2022cv04774
Plaintiff:
ERAN RUBINSTEIN and SUSAN M. BOLTZ-RUBINSTEIN
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, ARCH CAPITAL GROUP (US) INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
WEISS et al v. BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION et al
as 2:2015cv00062
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM WEISS , ROBERT LESSMAN , ANN HARRELL and others
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION , BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and BANK OF AMERICA REINSURANCE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MURPHY v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. et al
as 2:2013cv05719
Plaintiff:
BRIAN D. MURPHY
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. , THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, N.A. , ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-11 and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
TRICARICO v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. et al
as 2:2013cv05142
Plaintiff:
COSIMO TRICARICO
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP, COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
DAVIS et al v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. et al
as 2:2013cv04396
Plaintiff:
ROSALIND DAVIS and HARRY DAVIS
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. , MCCABE, WEISBERG & CONWAY, P.C., TERRENCE J. MCCABE and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
DAVIS v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. et al
as 2:2013cv01016
Plaintiff:
ROSALIND DAVIS and HARRY DAVIS
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and MCCABE, WEISBERG & CONWAY, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
MASON et al v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. et al
as 2:2013cv03966
Plaintiff:
PAMELA MASON, BARBARA WEAR and SYNELL HALL-PHILLIPS
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. , HSBC BANK USA NATIONAL ASSOCIATION , WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE LOAN and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
