Cases 31 - 40 of 260
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. 0.34 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Louis County, State of Missouri et al
as 4:2018cv01521
Defendant:
Eugene Weidner and Joyce Weidner Revocable Trust, dated October 26, 1999, 0.34 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Louis County, State of Missouri, Eugene Weidner, as Trustee of Eugene Weidner and Joyce Weidner Revocable Trust, dated October 26, 1999 and others
Plaintiff:
Spire STL Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00952
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Scott v. Carrington Mortgage Services et al
as 4:2018cv00935
Plaintiff:
Ernestine Scott
Defendant:
Carrington Mortgage Services, Bank of America and Taylor, Bean & Whitaker Mortgage Corp.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00427
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Ferguson et al v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 6:2018cv03134
Plaintiff:
J. Michael Ferguson and Nancy Ferguson
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv01066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Mohamed v. Bank of America N.A.
as 4:2017cv02814
Defendant:
Bank of America N.A.
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Amin Mohamed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00983
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv02479
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00744
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
