Cases filed in New York
DS et al v Rochester City School District et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2019cv06528
Plaintiff: R. Brian Goewey, CS and DS
Defendant: Kim Garlock, Nancy Resto, Nicole McCoy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2018cv06450
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2017cv06878
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2017cv06873
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Duboise v. First Student, Inc. et al
as 6:2017cv06681
Plaintiff: Kelly Duboise
Defendant: First Student, Inc. , Rochester City School District , Board of Education of Rochester City School District and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cooper et al v. Ward et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00824
Petitioner: Desean M. Cooper , Charles G. Masich , Dylan G. Quinlan and others
Defendant: Dennis E. Ward , Ralph M. Mohr , Douglas A. Kellner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Type: Civil Rights Voting
Hurtgam v. Lyndonville Central School et al
as 1:2007cv00716
Plaintiff: Kathleen A. Hurtgam
Defendant: Lyndonville Central School, Mathew Penrod, Barbara Deane-Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Williams v. Donovan et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv02804
Plaintiff: Barbara M. Williams
Defendant: John Donovan, Joseph Dolomite and Incorporated Village of Quogue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?