Cases 1 - 2 of 2
Morris & Morris, PSC, et al v. Gayle Slaughter, et al
as 14-5501
Plaintiff:
KEITH RENE GUY, SR., on behalf of themselves and all other persons similarly situated, BARRY LYNN DEMUS, JR., CHRISTOPHER ANDRE WILLIAMS and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOHN DOE IV #1-#37, on behalf of themselves and other similarly-situated, but as yet unknown, John Doe and Jane Doe victims, as a class, JANE DOE IV #1- #6, on behalf of themselves and other similarly-situated, but as yet unknown, John Doe and Jane Doe victims, as a class, JOHN DOE II #1-33 (EXCEPTING #5, 9, 21, 26 & 27), on behalf of themselves and other similarly-situated, but as yet unknown, John Doe and Jane Doe victims, as a class and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MORRIS & MORRIS P.S.C.
Defendant - Appellee:
LEXINGTON FAYETTE URBAN COUNTY GOVERNMENT, fka The City Of Lexington, H. FOSTER PETTIT, Individually and official capacity, JAMES AMATO and others
Keith Guy, Sr., et al v. LFUCG, et al
as 14-5496
Plaintiff:
KEITH RENE GUY, SR., on behalf of themselves and all other persons similarly situated, BARRY LYNN DEMUS, JR., CHRISTOPHER ANDRE WILLIAMS and others
Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
JOHN DOE IV #1-#37, on behalf of themselves and other similarly-situated, but as yet unknown, John Doe and Jane Doe victims, as a class, JANE DOE IV #1- #6, on behalf of themselves and other similarly-situated, but as yet unknown, John Doe and Jane Doe victims, as a class, JOHN DOE II #1-33 (EXCEPTING #5, 9, 21, 26 & 27), on behalf of themselves and other similarly-situated, but as yet unknown, John Doe and Jane Doe victims, as a class and others
Plaintiff - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
REX ROE #48, #62, #91, #97, #103, On behalf of themselves and all others who are similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
LEXINGTON FAYETTE URBAN COUNTY GOVERNMENT, fka The City Of Lexington, H. FOSTER PETTIT, in official and individual capacity, JAMES AMATO, Individually and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
